Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Would you watch a TPM re-edit?

    I would be curious to see this...

    From Salon.com, by Daniel Kraus

    The edit begins with the famous yellow scroll across the starry sky, only this time the scroll reads, in part:

    "... Being someone of the 'George Lucas Generation' I have re-edited a standard VHS version of "The Phantom Menace," into what I believe is a much stronger film by relieving the viewer of as much story redundancy, Anakin action and dialog, and Jar Jar Binks as possible."

    (Lucas' perplexing opening paragraph about "trade relations" and the "Imperial Senate" is gone. And we don't miss it because it wasn't necessary. Already, "The Phantom Edit" is making improvements.)

    Twenty minutes have been cut from the original 133, and as a result the film is tighter and faster. Jar-Jar, who has been demoted to an almost silent supporting role, is actually enjoyable. (A different "Phantom Edit" has dubbed over Jar-Jar with an alien voice, giving him subtitled dialogue that turns the gibbering idiot into a wise sage, spouting pearls like "Children and fools ask more questions" and "Pride can blind you from the truth.") Likewise, young Anakin -- whose shouts of "Yahoo!" and "Whoopee!" made many "Star Wars" fans grimace -- is a thoughtful, much quieter protagonist.

    Although entire extraneous sequences are missing (the journey to and from Jar-Jar's underwater home have been sliced), most of the changes are simply felt rather than individually noticed, as is the case with any good edit. The Phantom Editor has smartly taken advantage of Lucas' trademark "wipes" (a scene transition that scoots a new scene in from one edge of the screen to the other) to duck out of scenes early.
    Peeps who have hooked me up: General Grievous Dark Marble jjreason Ramy GrandMoffLouie Josephe vader121 Val Da Car

  2. #2
    No thanks. Noone but the origanal creator has a right to edit or change his movie. All this ammounts to is censoring and butchering of a film against the director/creator's wishes. Maybe they can start burning books they don't agree with also.

    MTFBWY and HH!!

    Jar Jar Binks
    THE SPY. THE SPACEMAN. THE GODDESS. THE ROBOT. THE GORILLA.

    AGENTS OF ATLAS - Returns in Early 2009.

  3. #3
    I really enjoy TPM and think it is a marvelous movie, so no need for me to watch The Phantom Edit

    PENDO!
    "You were my brother, Anakin. I loved you!" - Obi-Wan Kenobi
    "There's a gentleness about a total Star Wars geek that is sublime."- Rick McCallum
    My DVD Collection

  4. #4
    That's just as wrong as that organization that edits movies to eliminate all sex/drugs/language/nudity/violence.... that they deam unsuitable. God forbid any of those folks make it into the Louvre with a can of paint.
    "No one helped me so why should I help you?" - College professor circa 1999

    By choosing not to decide you still have made a choice.

    I'm in love with the women of Univision.

  5. #5
    Heck no! Unless Lucas is the one that edits it! I enjoyed the DVD edition with the added Coruscant scene.

    When I heard of the Phantom Edit, I laughed. It's ridiculous to go cutting scenes out of movies. I love it how they cut parts of the scrolling text because they say it isn't "necessary". I think it's very necessary, it wouldn't be there if it wasn't. It does set up the movie afterall.

    If these goons want to edit the Phantom Menace, let them do so. I'll continue to enjoy my DVD edition, edited by George Lucas and Ben Burtt.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by JarJarBinks
    No thanks. Noone but the origanal creator has a right to edit or change his movie. All this ammounts to is censoring and butchering of a film against the director/creator's wishes. Maybe they can start burning books they don't agree with also.

    MTFBWY and HH!!

    Jar Jar Binks
    I think of this as more akin to an artist doing a cover version of another artist's song or doing a remix. I think if you are doing it at home just for fun and you come out with something you think is superior, you haven't hurt anyone. I think the problem starts when you start distributing it on a massive level (assuming it cuts into sales, but lets face it, anyone who would want to see a TPM re-edit probably already has the regular DVD). Besides, "Star Wars" has been the inspiration for many fan works of all kinds.
    Peeps who have hooked me up: General Grievous Dark Marble jjreason Ramy GrandMoffLouie Josephe vader121 Val Da Car

  7. #7
    George's cut may not be a masterpiece . . . but why the hell would I jump to the edit of some hump like this ?

    So this dork has some problems with TPM and wants to edit it down for himself. Fine.
    He should look at his own life and get out the editing tools, first scene to cut would be:
    "overzealous fan promotes personal edit of sci-fi film over the internet"
    That's the first part to cut.

    Oh, one more plotline he may want to reconsider (and of course it is a he because no woman would be this stupid) is the part about an idiot who so loathes a movie yet feels compelled to devote such time and energy to making it better.

  8. #8
    Nope. I think it is just fine for my tastes. Oh, did Obi kill Maul in yours first?
    thanks Chux Turbo LBC Bobafrett Mtriv73 Rjarvis JF96 JT JMG FB Rogue2 Tycho Slicker Deoxy Caesar JontheJedi JJReason Brandon Solo JMS UK for great deals.
    SSG Pro Football Pick em and Bowl Pick em Champ 2006. 2007 NCAA Bracket Champ
    #24 - Gone but not forgotten

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Caesar
    George's cut may not be a masterpiece . . . but why the hell would I jump to the edit of some hump like this ?

    So this dork has some problems with TPM and wants to edit it down for himself. Fine.
    He should look at his own life and get out the editing tools, first scene to cut would be:
    "overzealous fan promotes personal edit of sci-fi film over the internet"
    That's the first part to cut.

    Oh, one more plotline he may want to reconsider (and of course it is a he because no woman would be this stupid) is the part about an idiot who so loathes a movie yet feels compelled to devote such time and energy to making it better.
    I have to admit that I have plans to do this as well at some undefined point in the future. When I have spare time. But I don't disagree with the fundamental idea of taking someone else's work and chipping away at it to make it "better" is okay. Nobody is perfect and there is almost always room for improvement. Why else would George have done the Special Editions?

    That last paragraph of yours caught my eye specifically though. Why would someone spend time on something they hate? My answer to that is "to make it into something they like!" Or at least make it closer to watchable. As I've said many times, George wasn't too far off the mark with TPM and AOTC. But what he forgot to do with both was to have a qualified writer polish his random mess of a story. Even the small changes in the AOTC IMAX release made a world of difference to that one...and those were done by someone else with his blessing! If only the same IMAX guys could have gotten ahold of TPM we might be having a different discussion right now.

    Anyhow, George is the one who has been crusading to change Hollywood into a digital world so ultimately he has to saddle some of the responsibility for putting this technology into the hands of lowly fanboy consumers, like you and me. Had TPM and AOTC been closer to perfect, then it wouldn't matter. I won't speak for anyone else, but because I see room for improvement in the Prequels, and because I have access to the technology to effect change, I will do so. If nothing else, I'll have the satisfaction of being able to tighten the story up and cut out the extraneous garbage that any qualified writer would have done at the script stage. I doubt that I'll make a major announcement about it, but when that day comes, I'll feel all warm and fuzzy inside with my bowl of popcorn and a 3 hour "Prequel" flickering on the Telly.

  10. #10
    Lucas himself once thought he could edit a better version of ESB, so he sat down and made his own cut that was supposedly unwatchably bad. After calming down and taking his ego out of the equation, he realized that his version was far from superior to what was intended for the film.

    In TPM, Lucas filmed and edited the final battle sequence pretty much the way the script had it, but upon viewing this work felt it quite lacking, so he asked Spielberg to come in and take a stab at it. Supposedly, the end of the film is mostly from Spielberg's edits and suggestions, changing a lot of timings and removing chunks of dialogue and action.

    What do these things tell me? That Lucas himself doesn't believe he's always the best editor for the finished product, so there's no reason for me to either. I believe Lucas has a lot of ideas that spring from a fertile imagination as well as the ability to borrow from a diverse, broad background of culture, stories and cinema, but anybody can become too close to something to the point where they lack the objectivity required to finish it and I firmly believe Lucas is in this boat and suffering from an overall lack of challenges and lack of strong opponents within his own trusted circle.

    So, I would not be averse to seeing another cut of the film, though unless it was LFL-approved as it was with the IMAX cut of AOTC, I wouldn't pay money to see it.
    Darth Vader is becoming the Mickey Mouse of Star Wars.

    "In Brooklyn, a castle, is where dwell I"
    The use of a lightsaber does not make one a Jedi, it is the ability to not use it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO